[dns-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org

["Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" <]

  I fail to see an "obvious", structural relationship between a LIR and
  the parties responsible for the reliable operation of a ccTLD name
  service?

  Wilfried.
  ______________________________________________________________________

>At 11:36 AM 10-09-03 +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>>On 10.09 12:18, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>>
>> > RIPE NCC should only monitor those ccTLDs that are LIRs or that their LIR
>> > is willing to endorse.   -Hank
>>
>>I like the principle. However ....
>>
>>How would this endoresement be determined?
>
>Each LIR would be entitled to one ccTLD to be monitored.  Most won't need 
>it.  Assuming there are about 50 countries in the RIPE area, and about 3500 
>LIRs, I am sure that one can find a LIR to support a ccTLD to be 
>monitored.  That means that the other countries in ARIN/APNIC/LACLIC would 
>have to fund their own service.
>
>-Hank
>LIR: il.iucc