About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [dns-wg] DNS Meeting in Amsterdam in September

  • To: Patrik Fältström < >
  • From: Edward Lewis < >
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:22:49 +0200

At 9:59 +0200 7/10/03, Patrik Fältström wrote:
Being the person responsible for the agenda for the September meeting, I
hereby ask for agenda items, and general input.
Please catagorize this under "general input." ;)

At the last meeting, DNS lameness was a topic.  Unfortunately I have
not dedicated enough time on my end to make significant progress on
my part, but I am wondering if there has been some in other areas.
(It's still 6 weeks off, so maybe I can do something.)

Recommending an approach to stamping out lame delegations is a high
goal, and I think finding a "grand unified approach" that satisfies
all is too big of a first step.

Two smaller steps that I think are attainable are:

1) Defining what is meant by the word "lame" in the operational
context - given that "lame delegations" are used in IETF RFCs to
describe a state that is a subset of the operational problem.

2) Defining a way to measure the extent of the problem.  I.e., Given a zone:
      How many delegations, NS RR's, and servers are present?
      What % of zones cannot be contacted at a given a moment?
      What % of servers ... the same.
      What % of NS RR's are a problem...

Note that #1 really is needed before #2 - because, what is a "problem?" ;)

One comment on this is that I think we can answer steps 1 and 2 given
different registry policies.  E.g., some registries are happy simply
if you can get an answer from a delegation.  On the other hand, some
registries won't be happy unless the responsible person answer mail
and that the MX RR does not refer to an open relay.

I'm suggesting that this might be a seed of an agenda item (but I
can't now promise to deliver an agenda item).

PS - Ordinarily, being policy neutral is a goal of any engineering
effort.  Perhaps though, it would be good to go the other way - try
and describe various policies so that we each have a broader view.
Shrug.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                            +1-703-227-9854
ARIN Research Engineer

...as graceful as a blindfolded bull in a china shop...




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community