About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

[db-wg] First draft of RIPE53 minutes

  • From: "Nigel Titley" <nigel.titley@localhost
  • Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:46:51 +0100

Folks,

Please find first rough draft of minutes of this morning's meeting. Comments welcome.

Nigel

 <<Minutes.txt>> 
							RIPE53 DB WG Draft Minutes V1.0

A. Administrative Matters
- scribe (Nigel T. and RIPE NCC)
- agenda (approved)
- approval of minutes from RIPE52(approval of minutes)
- review of action list
- "remote participation" coordination (if needed)

50.1 WW144		Take proposal to make the country attribute optional and multiple for inetnum
				and inet6num objects to the mailing list. Close and properly reformulate
				[AP53.1]
					
51.2 RIPE NCC	Check gnupgp compatibility before release of dated PGP
		 		signing functionality. Ongoing
					
51.5 ALL    	Check and see if there are any other missing IRIS
	         	attributes that are needed for the RIPE community. This
	         	should be on the whole community who should now be
	         	checking the IRIS server. Complete

51.8 RIPE NCC	To properly implement DB behaviour to always return irt:
		 		object on address queries, if it exists. Still ongoing but nearly complete
					
51.9 RIPE NCC   To contact a subset of the spam tool writers and make
		 		sure that they are aware of the change in behaviour as
		 		required by AP51.8. Ongoing
		 
52.1 WW144		Put out a call for a task force to help the RIPE NCC in the task of 
				updating the RIPE DB to comply with relevant Data Protection legislation.
				See presentation. Complete. See presentation
				
52.2 RIPE NCC	To send their proposal to support enum delegations, using the nserver: 
				attribute, to the WG-DB and DNS-DB mailing lists. Complete.
				
52.3 WW144+NT13	To reformulate irt: proposal and post to DB-WG mailing list. Complete

52.4 RIPE NCC	To produce statistics showing how many objects are only protected by 
				CRYPT-PW. Complete
				
52.5 RIPE NCC	To produce a proposal, with timescales, for removing CRYPT-PW
	 WW144		and circulate to the mailing list. Complete. See presentation.
 	 Peter Koch


B. Data Base Update (N.N., RIPE NCC)
	See presentation. 
	Check the irt: query behaviour. Note that the web query form implements the new
	behaviour. Note that circa 600 queries are received daily. There is no way to
	cover the ASN space at present.
	ASN32 is coming and we will need to make changes in RPSL syntax. Approximately
	10 objects and 41 attributes are affected.
	Total query rate is much the same as normal.
	Getting started document has been published. Please let NCC know if you find it
	useful.
	Operations and support is mostly business as usual.
	Forming a new database group and recruiting manager.
	A note was asked about getting client software upgraded to accept the new ASN32
	syntax. irrToolsets are being updated. However Geoff Huston pointed out that if you
	are running ASN16 then the behaviour of the irrToolset will have to take this into
	account.
	[AP53.2 RIPE NCC] To check and point out this requirement to various software
	developers: including but not limited to irrtoolset, quagga etc. 
	[AP53.3 RIPE NCC] To make sure that if there is a "flag day" for ASN32 behaviour
	then the planning and introduction for this is done properly and advertised 
	appropriately.
	It is important to decide whether the ASN16 to ASN32 translation takes place in the
	client or database. The general feeling was that tools are going to break anyway
	so we may as well fix them. The breakage will happen slowly however which is proably
	manageable. The default allocations will continue to be ASN16 and those who ask for
	ASN32 must expect problems initially.
	[AP53.4 WW144] Alert Routing WG about the implications of the ASN16 to ASN32 transition
	on tools.

C. Task-Force on Data Protection Issues (Jochen d. R. RIPE NCC)
	See presentation.
	Depending on the local Data Protection laws, ISPs may be required to build notification
	into their contracts that details may be registered in the RIPE DB.
	Mirroring outside the EU has been frozen (no new mirrors accepted at the moment)
	The Data Protection Task Force has not yet been set up, but will be.
	A set of items to be considered and actions required has been proposed.
	The charter has been published (see presentation).
	Volunteers please send an email to Jochem and copied to Wilfried.

D. Proposal to retire CRYPT-PW (Peter K., denic.de + WW144)
	See presentation.
	Still 3500 maintainer objects which use only CRYPT-PW.
	CRYPT-PW much too weak. Explicit warnings seem to be falling on deaf ears.
	Adverse publicity could be quite damaging in the event of a serious hack.
	2 month phase out plan. 1 month notification then 1 month while creation of new
	CRYPT-PW authentication is rejected, warnings when updating objects that contain
	CRYPT-PW, finally inform contacts and public again. After that CRYPT-PW
	authenication schemes will be deleted and maintainers where that was the only
	authentication method will be locked and released manually by the RIPE NCC on
	application. It was decided to start phase 1 now. Phase 2 will be extended as
	necessary to account for the end of the year hiatus.

E. Review irt: e-mail/abuse-mailbox (Philippe B., CyberAbuse)
	This concerns some email on the list. The proposal was to make it easier for the
	maintainers of tools by always returning an abuse mailbox wherever it may be
	found. 
	We have to decide what direction to follow and decide how to populate the database
	with appropriate abuse addresses. We don't even know whether the database is the right
	place to store this information.
	The address policy working group has considered this and will talk to their mailing list.
	We should really start to think about the overall strategy rather than nibbling
	away at the problem.

F. Update on the Poetry Object (Nigel T.)
	See presentation.


Y. Input from other WGs
    ENUM-WG: on (new?) organisation type for Database Object
    The is the type of the ORG object. The proposal is to change the type
    NON-REGISTRY to OTHER. The DB WG has no objection.
    [AP53.5 WW144]Wait for the formal consensus of the ENUM WG and then ask the RIPE NCC 
    to make the change.

Z. AOB





 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community