Re: [db-wg] Since when does one need 3 nameservers for inverse?

[Ulrich Schmid schmid@localhost]

on 8.2.2006 11:10 Uhr Brett Carr wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: db-wg-admin@localhost On Behalf Of Hank Nussbacher
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:19 AM
>> Cc: rdns-project@localhost
>> Subject: [db-wg] Since when does one need 3 nameservers for inverse?
>>
>> In the "Reverse Delegation How To":
>> http://www.ripe.net/rs/reverse/reverse_howto.html
>> it states:
>>
>> "NS Servers
>> Ensure you have at least two nameservers that are 
>> authoritative for the zone. The resolvable names of these NS 
>> servers should be in the NS resource records of the zone. The 
>> nameservers should be on different subnets."
>>
>> Yet when I submit a request I get:
>> ***RDNS:    (related to set) ERROR (20 points): At least 3 nameservers
>>              are required for each properly delegated zone. 
>> We found only
>>              2 in your submission.
>>
>> In addition the reverse delegation checker at:
>> http://www.ripe.net/cgi-bin/delcheck/delcheck2.cgi
>> doesn't flag only 2 nameservers as an error.
>>
>> What gives?
>>
> 
> Indeed you are right, something doesn't look quite right here. Thanks for
> flagging it I'll take a look.
> 
> Brett
> 

Any news about this item?
Changes to the domain objects are still rejected by the delegation
checker due to the (wrong) requirement of 3 nameservers and this
prevents us to perform simple updates (e.g. contact address changes).



Regards
Ulrich Schmid