Re: Fw: [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Draft Documentis Published (Proposal to Amend the IPv6 Assignment and Utilisation Requirement Policy)

[Nick Hilliard nick@localhost]

> While this increases flexibility it still has an arbritrary feel to it. 
> Why 200 assignments?
Please see:

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-02.html

The intention is to replace the completely arbitrary "200 /48's" with "a 
reasonable number of /48's".  In fact, they mean the same thing, because 
 any LIR can have a *plan* to assign 200 x /48s, regardless of whether 
this plan is ever going to be implemented or not.
But this is not particularly relevant to proposal 2005-08.

Nick