About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [address-policy-wg] Draft agenda Address Policy Working Group RIPE 46

  • To: leo vegoda < >
  • From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist < >
  • Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:23:59 +0200
  • Cc: Joao Luis Silva Damas < >
    Hans Petter Holen < >

thanks for the numbers. How about the rest of the information requested?
You wanted some information on the background, types of PI requests and other things.

We don't keep statistics on the motivation for a request for PI address space. In fact, we don't ask for it in most cases. We just make sure that the requester is aware of the issues that come with small blocks of address space and any possible alternatives to PI address space.

However, we do keep statistics on the stated use the address space will be put to. However, the majority of PI assignments we make will be used for more than one purpose. In these cases it is often impossible to label an assignment with a single category. Instead, we label it as "Miscellaneous".

This year, the "Miscellaneous" category has been appropriate in about 69% of assignments. Another 19% were for office LANs. We also had 4% used for server hosting, 3% for broadband services, about 1% for P2P links and about 1% for GPRS services.

From what I remember of what you said in Barcelona, the absolute numbers of PI space assigned is really low though, right?

- kurtis -




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community